﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<title>Blog | Security Whole: Recent Comments</title>
	<updated>2010-03-20T22:30:27Z</updated>
	<id>http://blog.securitywhole.com/comments/atom.aspx</id>
	<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/comments/atom.aspx" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<generator uri="http://app.onlinequickblog.com/" version="2.0">Quick Blogcast</generator>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Finding Meterpreter</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2010/01/31/finding-meterpreter.aspx#comment-2827956" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2010-02-14:2827956</id>
		<author>
			<name>Tim Medin</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2010-02-15T03:40:44Z</updated>
		<published>2010-02-15T03:40:44Z</published>
		<content type="html">Interesting idea. I would imagine would difficult to implement with reasonable accuracy.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;And great post.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Finding Meterpreter</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2010/01/31/finding-meterpreter.aspx#comment-2822208" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2010-02-12:2822208</id>
		<author>
			<name>jah</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2010-02-13T02:18:15Z</updated>
		<published>2010-02-13T02:18:15Z</published>
		<content type="html">I know that when you migrate meterpreter to a different process, you can see the change in that processes memory usage (private bytes, working set, etc). I bet if you did enough measuring, you could come up with a ballpark size as a signature for meterpreter. The problem with this approach is that you would need a baseline for the memory usage of each process on the machine.&lt;BR&gt; &lt;BR&gt;This was a very interesting article and showed some nice techniques. I was recently doing some experimentation with metasploit and wrote a blog entry on my findings. If you're interested, the url is: &lt;A href="http://jah-internship.blogspot.com/2010/02/simwitty-internship-week-4.html"&gt;http://jah-internship.blogspot.com/2010/02/simwitty-internship-week-4.html&lt;/A&gt;</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Getting registry last write time with PowerShell</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2010/02/02/getting-registry-last-write-time-with-powershell.aspx#comment-2816782" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2010-02-11:2816782</id>
		<author>
			<name>Tim Medin</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2010-02-11T16:38:13Z</updated>
		<published>2010-02-11T16:38:13Z</published>
		<content type="html">The problem is each value does not have a timestamp, just the key. That means that you can't get the detail you want. It just isn't a feature that Windows provides.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To get the LastWriteTime of the Devices Key run the command at one key higher.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Get-RegTimestamp.ps1 HKCU "Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;font face="Courier New"&gt;Key&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; LastWriteTime&lt;br&gt;---&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; -------------&lt;br&gt;...&lt;br&gt;Devices&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2/11/2010 1:31:22 PM&lt;br&gt;...&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Getting registry last write time with PowerShell</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2010/02/02/getting-registry-last-write-time-with-powershell.aspx#comment-2815900" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2010-02-11:2815900</id>
		<author>
			<name>Paul</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2010-02-11T11:46:06Z</updated>
		<published>2010-02-11T11:46:06Z</published>
		<content type="html">Hello,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    I`m trying to find out the date on which a network printer was installed on the workstation. I`m using the registry keys in "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Devices\" to find this out. Unfortunately the above command does not return the information needed. all i get is " .\Get-RegKeyLastWriteTime.ps1 &lt;br /&gt;HKCU Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Devices&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Key                                     LastWriteTime&lt;br /&gt;---                                     -------------&lt;br /&gt;CurrentVersion                          27.01.2010 13:54:08&lt;br /&gt;Shell                                   06.01.2010 14:18:47&lt;br /&gt;ShellNoRoam                             06.01.2010 15:02:40</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Finding Meterpreter</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2010/01/31/finding-meterpreter.aspx#comment-2777407" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2010-02-01:2777407</id>
		<author>
			<name>Tim Medin</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2010-02-01T15:00:22Z</updated>
		<published>2010-02-01T15:00:22Z</published>
		<content type="html">You would not be able to find it with this method since explorer already loads these dll's.</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Finding Meterpreter</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2010/01/31/finding-meterpreter.aspx#comment-2777329" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2010-02-01:2777329</id>
		<author>
			<name>CG</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2010-02-01T14:19:54Z</updated>
		<published>2010-02-01T14:19:54Z</published>
		<content type="html">if you migrate into explorer.exe to you see that same results?</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Rickroll Meterpreter Script</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2009/03/30/rickroll-meterpreter-script.aspx#comment-2482226" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2009-10-08:2482226</id>
		<author>
			<name>Thorin</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2009-10-08T14:04:55Z</updated>
		<published>2009-10-08T14:04:55Z</published>
		<content type="html">Thanks Tim!</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Rickroll Meterpreter Script</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2009/03/30/rickroll-meterpreter-script.aspx#comment-2481427" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2009-10-07:2481427</id>
		<author>
			<name>Tim Medin</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2009-10-08T02:10:48Z</updated>
		<published>2009-10-08T02:10:48Z</published>
		<content type="html">Just a typo, fixed.&lt;br&gt;</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on Rickroll Meterpreter Script</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2009/03/30/rickroll-meterpreter-script.aspx#comment-2475222" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2009-10-05:2475222</id>
		<author>
			<name>Thorin</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2009-10-05T13:34:49Z</updated>
		<published>2009-10-05T13:34:49Z</published>
		<content type="html">I'm confused about the -e option "Disable Keyboard &amp;amp; Keyboard" .....&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;See a lot of systems with dual keyboards?</content>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Comment on www.microsoft.com and hosts file wierdness. Why?</title>
		<link href="http://blog.securitywhole.com/2009/04/01/wwwmicrosoftcom-and-hosts-file-wierdness-why.aspx#comment-2466730" rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<id>tag:blog.securitywhole.com,2009-10-01:2466730</id>
		<author>
			<name>Tim Medin</name>
		</author>
		<updated>2009-10-01T13:05:14Z</updated>
		<published>2009-10-01T13:05:14Z</published>
		<content type="html">That is what I decided too, but I thought it was odd that I couldn't find any documentation on it.</content>
	</entry>
</feed>